<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storage Folks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagefolks.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagefolks.com</link>
	<description>Think Storage, Dream Storage, Talk Storage.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Data ONTAP Upgrade &#8211; Mavericks Way/My Way</title>
		<link>http://storagefolks.com/network-appliance/5/data-ontap-upgrade-mavericks-waymy-way</link>
		<comments>http://storagefolks.com/network-appliance/5/data-ontap-upgrade-mavericks-waymy-way#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>srikanth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Appliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagefolks.com/blog/network-appliance/5/data-ontap-upgrade-mavericks-waymy-way</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Fellas, If you have upgraded your ONTAP before you must have read or heard of three standard procedures recommended by NetApp in their NetApp upgrade guide. Here I explain the other way which I always used to upgrade Data &#8230; <a href="http://storagefolks.com/network-appliance/5/data-ontap-upgrade-mavericks-waymy-way">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Fellas,</p>
<p>If you have upgraded your ONTAP before you must have read or heard of three standard procedures recommended by NetApp in their NetApp upgrade guide. Here I explain the other way which I always used to upgrade Data ONTAP, right from my first upgrade couple of years ago. This procedure is nothing but a mix of two of the procedures defined by NetApp and there is no way it can go wrong theoritically. I Had performed over 30 filer ONTAP upgrades in different customer environments with a success rate of 100%.</p>
<p>This article doesnt talk about the upgrading disk f/w, Shelf firmware or microcode. It only talks about ONTAP upgrade and the prerequisite like firmware revisions still applicable and this is not gonna bypass any of them. If you feel this blog is little long then just scroll down to bottom and read last 3 paragraphs(Small ones) which is what I call My Way of upgrading.</p>
<p><span id="more-5"></span></p>
<p>First lets look at the three standard procedures for upgrading ONTAP as defined in NetApp upgrade guide.</p>
<p>* Before Upgrade I recommend you to raise a support call with NetApp asking for ONTAP Upgrade plan if you have your Autosupport Enabled, provide them the filer serial numbers you want to upgrade and they will get back to you with a detailed plan generated using automated tools. This is important in understanding dependancies like System Firmware, Shelf Firmware and Disk Firware. If you are do not have Autosupport enabled, read the release notes of ONTAP to check them.<br />
1)<strong>HTTP Server (Unix/Windows Admin host)</strong><br />
Â -&gt;Get the System Files for your filer model (.exe) for HTTP server upgrade &amp; also other firmware if required and not bundled in ONTAP(which is most cases).<br />
Â -&gt;load it on your webserver.<br />
Â -&gt;Log on to filer which needs upgrade<br />
Â -&gt;Execute the following commands and you are done,<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  <em>software get &lt;&lt;url where system files is located&gt;&gt;<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  software install &lt;systemfilename.exe&gt;&gt;<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  software download<br />
</em>Â -&gt;You are done with ONTAP upgrade, you may wish to upgrade disk firmware or shelf firmware<br />
Â -&gt;Reboot your filer to start using new ONTAP.(Before rebooting you can use version -b to check its upgraded or not)</p>
<p><strong>2) Windows Server (Admin Host)<br />
</strong>Â -&gt;Get the System Files for your filer model (.exe) for Windows host upgrade &amp; also other firmware if required and not bundled in ONTAP(which is most cases).<br />
Â -&gt;Map the vol0 as Network drive (Writable)<br />
Â -&gt;Extract the .exe file onto vol0<br />
Â -&gt;Execute the following commands and you are done,<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â <em>software install &lt;systemfilename.exe&gt;&gt;<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â software download<br />
</em>Â -&gt;You are done with ONTAP upgrade, you may wish to upgrade disk firmware or shelf firmware<br />
Â -&gt;Reboot your filer to start using new ONTAP.(Before rebooting you can use version -b to check its upgraded or not)</p>
<p><strong>3) UNIX Server (Admin Host)<br />
</strong>Â -&gt;Get the System Files for your filer model (.tar) for UNIX/Linux host upgrade &amp; also other firmware if required and not bundled in ONTAP(which is most cases).<br />
Â -&gt;Mount the vol0 (Writeable)<br />
Â -&gt;Extract the .exe file onto vol0<br />
Â -&gt;Execute the following commands and you are done,<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  <em>software install &lt;systemfilename.exe&gt;&gt;<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  software download<br />
</em>Â -&gt;You are done with ONTAP upgrade, you may wish to upgrade disk firmware or shelf firmware<br />
Â -&gt;Reboot your filer to start using new ONTAP.(Before rebooting you can use version -b to check its upgraded or not)</p>
<p><strong>NOTE:</strong>You can peform upgrade remotely but I recommend you to be near filer incase if your filer doesn&#8217;t come up after reboot you can use diagnostic tools to troubleshoot. I faced one instance like that and this is due to the NetApp had not bundled the right firmware. (6.5P3 to 6.5.P5 if I remember it right)</p>
<p><strong><em>Mavericks Way or My Way of upgrade:</em></strong><br />
Â -&gt;Get the System Files for your filer model (.exe) for HTTP server upgrade &amp; also other firmware if required and not bundled in ONTAP(which is most cases).<br />
Â -&gt;copy the .exe system file to the /etc/software folder on vol0 of Filer which needs an upgrade. (use checksums to verify file is copied properly)<br />
Â -&gt;Log on to filer which needs upgrade<br />
Â -&gt;Execute the following commands and you are done,<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  <em>software list (It should show you the newly copied file)<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  software install &lt;systemfilename.exe&gt;&gt;<br />
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  software download<br />
</em>Â -&gt;You are done with ONTAP upgrade, you may wish to upgrade disk firmware or shelf firmware<br />
Â -&gt;Reboot your filer to start using new ONTAP.(Before rebooting you can use version -b to check its upgraded or not)</p>
<p>What am I doing here actually is nothing but doing the job of software get command manually. When you issue a software get it gets the file and places it in /etc/software on vol0 and we are exactly doing the same.</p>
<p><strong>Whats the advantage of doing this way:<br />
</strong>Strictly speaking nothing but if you don&#8217;t have webserver or don&#8217;t want to use winzip or tar command then this is for you.Its as simple as http server method even if you don&#8217;t have webserver.</p>
<p>Drop a comment for any kind of discussions <img src='http://storagefolks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  We love it.</p>
<p>Have a Nice Day<br />
Chundi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://storagefolks.com/network-appliance/5/data-ontap-upgrade-mavericks-waymy-way/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAID Unleashed (Beauty of RAID)</title>
		<link>http://storagefolks.com/storage-basics/3/raid-unleashed-beauty-of-raid</link>
		<comments>http://storagefolks.com/storage-basics/3/raid-unleashed-beauty-of-raid#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>srikanth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage Basics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagefolks.com/blog/storage-basics/3/raid-unleashed-beauty-of-raid</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Folks, I started my Storage Career with understanding RAID, it was really confusing to me when I started reading but over a period of time analyzing the logic and understanding the different RAID levels made me realize this is &#8230; <a href="http://storagefolks.com/storage-basics/3/raid-unleashed-beauty-of-raid">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 100%">Hi Folks,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%">I started my Storage Career with understanding RAID, it was really confusing to me when I started reading but over a period of time analyzing the logic and understanding the different RAID levels made me realize this is one of the beautiful things researchers at Univ of California, Berkeley ever produced. Without RAID forget all your great boxes of NetApp, EMC, Hitachi etc., can do, they are just useless.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%">Here I&#8217;m gonna explain the RAID in very basic terms which I think everyone will understand for sure. Why waiting&#8230;.Lets dig into it. Its a bit lengthy and supposed to be tutorial rather than blog though.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%"></span><span id="more-3"></span><strong>What is RAID?</strong><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></strong><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%">RAID is generally referred to as <strong>R</strong>edundant <strong>A</strong>rray of <strong>I</strong>ndependent <strong>D</strong>isks. Basically a group of small harddisks combined to simulate a large harddisk(HDD) with advantages of better performance and data protection. For eg., if I want a 1000GB today what I will do is I&#8217;ll buy 10 100GB HDD&#8217;s and put a software on top of it which combines all this HDDs and project as a single HDD to the Server. And this software also increase the performance by doing striping and gives data protection by doing Mirroring/Parity generation. (Will explain Striping, Mirroring and Parity soon and how they increase performance/Data protection in next few paras). Some times this piece of Software is installed on Operating System and is referred as Software RAID and sometime this is done at the hardware level and is referred as RAID controllers. Obviously embedding this piece of Software at Hardware level gives better performance as it offload the OS job. Software RAIDs are available from Veritas, Sourceforge.net, Windows has builtin. Hardware RAID are from Adaptec, HP etc.,. All the NAS and SAN boxes will have RAID controllers built-in.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%">Some people also refer RAID as Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks, but strictly speaking I don&#8217;t like this expansion because if I can afford million $$ also a single disk cant give what RAID can offer (Data Protection and Performance).</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"></span><br />
<strong>RAID Terminology</strong></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">When someone talks about RAID they need to talk about striping, mirroring and parity. These are three basic terms used in RAID.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"><strong>Striping:</strong> Striping is the nothing but splitting the data and writing the data onto multiple harddisks simultaneously. Advantages of this being, since the harddisk are mechanical devices there is a limitation on speed with which you can write data on to Harddisks. For eg a 15K Ultra SCSI HDD you can write only upto 320MB per second(Believe me its the highest available today). What if you want to write more? So if your application needs more writing speed, you will split the data and write parallely onto multiple harddisks. So with a 10 such harddisks you can achieve 3200MBps speed. This amazing piece of striping is implemented in the RAID software program.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"><strong>Mirroring:</strong> As the name indicates its the mirror of the actual data, I mean its the exact copy of the data which is stored on another extra harddisk(s). Mirroring is the terminology used for writing the same data onto the two different harddisks. This gives data protection against Harddisk Hardware failures. For eg if you want to your important files then you write it to two different harddisks such that if one hard disk fails you can retrieve from other hard disk. This piece of software is also embedded in the RAID software program.</span> <span style="font-size: 100%">It can be done two ways 1)write on to two disks simultaneously and 2) Write onto one disk and copy from that disks.<br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"><strong>Parity:</strong> As we have seen above Mirroring need double the space of the data you want to store to give additional protection. For example if I have some 10HDDs I need another 10HDDs to give the data protection if I use RAID. Means its adding your IT expenses whenever you want to write data. So researchers came with a concept of parity. What it does is it dedicates one harddisk as parity disk and write only a single bit on parity disk which for every 10 bits written on 10 Harddisks. It uses XOR algorithm to generate this parity bit. For eg., if you have written 1,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0 bits on ten harddisks then bit 1 is written on parity disk. Suppose if I loose any one bit on any one of the 10 harddisks I can get that using doing XOR on 9 actual bits and 1 parity bit. So the same data protection is offered using Parity as with Mirroring. Recovery from parity is little slower thought you have protected your data because everytime you read the data you will execute a XOR operation which is a overhead. Its upto you to decide you want Parity or Mirroring, because there is a commercial also involved. This parity program is also embedded into RAID software program. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"></span><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000"><span style="font-size: 100%; color: #000066"><strong>As I told earlier you can install this RAID software program on your Server directly or put it on a microchip which does this dedicated job to reduce overload CPU cycle which can be used to boost your application performance.</strong></span><br />
</span><span style="font-size: 100%"></span><br />
<strong>What RAID can offer you?</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%">By this time knowing the Striping, Mirroring and Parity you should have got a fair Idea of what RAID can offer to you. Using those three beautiful programs separately or in combination you can achieve best of performance and protection to suit your business needs. I used the word Business needs because your option should be based on <strong><span style="color: #ff0000">technical/commercial</span></strong> and not only on technical basis.</span><span style="font-size: 100%">Many people in the Industry today often call this combinations as RAID levels. Some of the popular RAID levels being</span></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID 0 &#8211; Striping Only</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID 1 &#8211; Mirroring Only</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID 3 &#8211; Striping with dedicated Parity</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID 4 &#8211; Striping with dedicated Parity(NetApp&#8217;s baby using blocks rather than bytes)</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID 5 &#8211; Striping with Rotational Parity</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID 0+1 (01) &#8211; First RAID 0 then RAID 1(From Server Point of View)</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID 1+0 (10) &#8211; First RAID 1 then RAID 0(From Server point of View)</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">RAID DP(Diagonal Parity) &#8211; RAID 4 with additional parity which is calculated based on diagonal bits. </span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">Now a days people tend to use to use more combinations(levels) of RAID like 5+0, 5+1, 1+0+1 for some of the benefits this levels can give. But the popular ones are being 0, 1,3,4,10,01,DP(with recent NetApp 7g). Lets discuss what each of these popular RAID levels has got to offer you. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%"><strong>RAID 0:</strong>RAID 0 is striping only. Its nothing but splitting the data and writing onto multiple harddisks simultaneously to get better performance. There is not protection for your data if one disk fails you will loose your data.</span><br />
<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/1600/RAID%200.2.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/320/RAID%200.2.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; cursor: pointer; text-align: center" /></a></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%; color: #330033"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%; color: #330033"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%; color: #330033"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%; color: #330033"><strong><br />
I&#8217;m not gonna write full advantages and disadvantages, I want you to think. But I&#8217;ll write the basic and the important adv/dis-adv. Also think what kind of applications each RAID can be used for.</strong></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"><br />
Advantages : Better Performance(Read/Write) in terms of both Read and Write, 100% Disk Utilization.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"><br />
Disadvantages: When it comes to Data Protection its as useless as using single hard disk. One disk fails your gone, you will have a nightmare recovering your data from tapes.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"><strong><br />
RAID 1:</strong> RAID 1 is mirroring only. Means when you write your data you write the same date to two set of disks so that if one disk fails you can start using other disks.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/1600/RAID%201.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/320/RAID%201.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; cursor: pointer; text-align: center" /></a><br />
<span style="font-size: 100%">Advantages: Best Data protection. If you loose one disk, you have the data on other disk. No need to regenerate the actual data from parity in case of disk failure, so its the fastest recovery.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%"></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 100%">Disadvantages: 100% overhead. No performance gains.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%"></span><span style="font-size: 100%"></span><span style="font-size: 100%"></p>
<p align="justify"><strong>RAID 3:</strong>RAID 3 is Striping with Parity. Did you realize when ever I talked about striping I said splitting the data and writing on the multiple harddisk but did I mention the unit for striping. I mean how many parts the data will be split into and what size each stripe will be. The possible units can be bits, bytes, blocks. RAID 3 is striping the data based on bytes.Means whenever a data write request comes it divides it splits them into small chunks of size 1 byte and write this chunks into multiple harddisks parallely. While doing the same it also executes the XOR operation for all those parallely written chunks and generate the parity byte and write that to the dedicated parity disks. Confusing&#8230;.Read again. Its nothing but Striping with byte as unit and writing the parity onto a dedicated disks.</p>
<p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/1600/RAID%203.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/320/RAID%203.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; cursor: pointer; text-align: center" /></a></p>
<p align="justify">Advantages: Better performance(read/write), Data Protection, Better utilization of Harddisks(1 disk is wasted for each RAID Group, RAID Group is nothing but set of disks on which RAID is applied)</p>
<p align="justify">Disadvantages: Rebuilding time incase of disk fails, though you will be able to access your data performance is impacted.</p>
<p align="justify"><strong>RAID 4:</strong> This is similar to RAID 3 but with the stripe unit as Block not Byte. This has got its own advantages like performance improvement compared to RAID 3 in term of both read and write. This has become popular because NetApp uses RAID 4 in their earlier model boxes( still in use).</p>
<p><strong><br />
Same image as above.</strong><strong>RAID 5: Unlike RAID 4 where it uses a dedicated parity disk, RAID 5 is Striping(block level) with Rotational Parity. There is no dedicated parity disk and each time a new chunk of data is being written it chooses one of the data disks to write the parity bit. By doing this it reduces the rebuild time of the actual data and also it increases the integrity of the data.</strong><strong><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/1600/RAID%205.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/320/RAID%205.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; cursor: pointer; text-align: center" /></a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p align="justify">Advantages: Better performance(high read/medium write), Data protection with better integrity, Better utilization of disk, faster rebuild of actual data incase of disk fail.</p>
<p align="justify">Disadvantages: If implemented as software, it chokes up your CPU &amp; Memory utilization, During rebuild of actual data incase of disk failure may result in slow performance though your data is accessible.</p>
<p align="justify"><strong><br />
RAID 01:</strong> Here comes the interesting &amp; confusing part, till now you have seen a combinations of Striping, mirroring and parity now its the time for combinations of above RAID levels. To make it simple use this when using multiple raid levels(RAID XY), split the harddisks into sets then do RAID X on disks in each set and then do a RAID Y for those sets. For eg you have 10 disks and want to do RAID 01 means first RAID o and then RAID 1, so split this disks into two sets of 5, now do a RAID 0 on each of these 5 disks in both the sets, then do a RAID 1 on two sets as if it was only two harddisks(remember the basics, once raid is implemented it will simulate single disk).</p>
<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/1600/RAID%2001.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/320/RAID%2001.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; cursor: pointer; text-align: center" /></a></p>
<p align="justify">Advantages: Higher Data protection, better performance even incase of disk failure</p>
<p align="justify">Disavdantages: 50% utilization of the disks and one disk failure may result in whole mirror rebuild for providing data protection again.</p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-weight: bold">RAID 10:</span> Again apply the same formula of RAID XY, in this case we will do RAID 1 first and RAID 0 then so we need to divide the disks into set of two each and do a RAID 1 and then do a RAID 0 on all these sets.<br />
<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/1600/RAID%2010.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7950/1931/320/RAID%2010.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; cursor: pointer; text-align: center" /></a></p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">Advantages: Higher Data protection, better performance even incase of disk failure</p>
<p>Disavdantages: 50% utilization of the disks.</p>
<p align="justify">As I mentioned earlier I don&#8217;t want to write a detailed advantages and dis-advantages, I want you to think what are the advantages and why. What I mentioned in advantages are very few compared to full list.</p>
<p>Now you know the basics of RAID why don&#8217;t you give a thought where you can apply and most importantly why that&#8217;s the best you think for your business. Believe me there are lot of application vendors(ISVs) who tells which RAID to be used but please understand why they are saying so, do you think giving a general recommendation without knowing your business needs(technical requirements and budget available) is viable. If I&#8217;ve a million $$ lying with me and want to host DB server, I go by technical recommedations I go for RAID 10 but what if I don&#8217;t have enough $$ to afford RAID 10. So justifying the investment is important. <strong>Best technical recommendations are given by people who are passionate about technology but they don&#8217;t think is it worth investment or can you afford.</strong> So you need to trade off between best technical and commercial solutions and come to a conclusion which RAID is right for your Business.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Chundi</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://storagefolks.com/storage-basics/3/raid-unleashed-beauty-of-raid/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>StorageFolks.com</title>
		<link>http://storagefolks.com/site-news/1/storage-folks</link>
		<comments>http://storagefolks.com/site-news/1/storage-folks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Came across this site and wondering what it is all about, well the aim behind starting this is to develop our skills with the help of you Folks. We believe learning will be better and faster when you share thoughts &#8230; <a href="http://storagefolks.com/site-news/1/storage-folks">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across this site and wondering what it is all about, well the aim behind starting this is to develop our skills with the help of you Folks. We believe learning will be better and faster when you share thoughts and let other Fellas comment on it and discuss with them, it helps everyone who participate to learn, discuss and <strong>argue</strong> on interesting things in this wonderful world  of Storage.</p>
<p>This blog will be a part of the Main site(Which will be available very soon) with lots and lots of interesting features and some tutorials.</p>
<p>At this moment, we have a two members who will contribute to this Site with one of them Brocade Certified SAN Designer(BCSD) and Other ex-NetApp folk. They love to talk anything about Storage (May not be good at the Commands kind of stuff but Can talk anything conceptually). You can even discuss about the certifications and they will like to share their experience with you in achieving your Certifications.</p>
<p>Apart from the above two major contributors we also we have a chief adviser, one of the Solid technical person I&#8217;ve ever came across who carries 25+ years of Industry experience with him in Infrastructure domain.</p>
<p><strong><em> We hope to bring great content for the Folks who are interested in Enterprise Storage. </em></strong></p>
<p>Storage is our passion and we are so passionate that we wanted the whole world know about our passion. We Think Storage, Dream Storage, Talk Storage.</p>
<p>-StorageFolks Team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://storagefolks.com/site-news/1/storage-folks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

